4.7 Article

Direct electrodeposition ofNi-Co-Son carbon paper as an efficient cathode for anion exchange membrane water electrolysers

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 1918-1931

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.5875

关键词

anion exchange membrane water electrolyser; electrodeposition; hydrogen evolution reaction; self-supported electrode; water electrolysis

资金

  1. Korea Electric Power Corporation [R18XA06-27]
  2. Chung-Ang University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of an efficient Ni-Co-S cathode for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) enables high activity in an anion exchange membrane water electrolizer (AEMWE). By optimizing the Ni-Co-S/CP electrode, the HER performance is enhanced, leading to a higher current density in AEMWE single cells compared to traditional Pt/C/CP cathodes. Enhancements in electron and reactant/product transfer play a key role in improving overall performance.
The development of an efficient water electrolyser is essential for sustainable hydrogen production; however, its application remains limited by the insufficient performance of the electrode. Herein, we report a rapid, simple, and cost-effective fabrication of an Ni-Co-S cathode for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), which is directly usable for an anion exchange membrane water electrolyser (AEMWE). The Ni-Co-S electrocatalysts are prepared on a carbon paper (CP) substrate by a one-step electrodeposition method by controlling deposition parameters such as the deposition potential, time, and electrolyte composition. The optimized Ni-Co-S/CP electrode demonstrates a high HER activity with an overpotential of 91 mV at -10 mA/cm(2)in 1.0 M KOH. An AEMWE single cell employing the Ni-Co-S/CP cathode coupled with a commercial IrO2/CP anode exhibits a current density of 1.7 A/cm(2)at 2.4 V-cell, which is higher than that of an AEMWE single cell with a commercial Pt/C/CP cathode; this is attributable to the enhancement of the electron and reactant/product transfer via appropriate cathode design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据