4.6 Article

Determinants of outcome in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction & secondary mitral regurgitation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 323, 期 -, 页码 229-234

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.104

关键词

Heart failure; Mitral regurgitation; Secondary; Functional

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation Clinical Research Training Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the impact factors on the prognosis of patients with secondary mitral regurgitation and heart failure, and found that GLS abnormality, LVEDV/EROA ratio, and RVol/SV ratio are the main determinants of cardiovascular mortality.
Background: The outcome of secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with heart failure is poor. Survival is related to the severity of MR. We sought to investigate the effect of left ventricular contractility, the ratio of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) to effective orifice area (EROA) and the ratio of regurgitant volume (RVol) to stroke volume (SV) on cardiovascular survival. Methods: 188 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% and secondary MR were included. Groups were divided into tertiles. The Kaplan Meier method and log rank test were used to identify differences in survival between groups. Cox regression was used to identify independent predictors of cardiac mortality. Results: Median follow-up was 30.4 months. Patients with a more abnormal global longitudinal strain (GLS) had lower survival, p = 0.001. There was no difference in survival between patients with an LVEF 30%, 30%-40% and 5.6%) hazard ratio (HR) 2.7, the ratio of RVol/SV (1.38) HR 4.96 and the ratio of LVDEV to EROA (<263) HR 4.49. Conclusion: The main determinants of cardiovascular mortality in patients with secondary MR and heart failure are more abnormal GLS, lower LVEDV/EROA ratio and higher RVol/SV ratio. These may help risk stratify patients to help determine the optimal management strategy. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据