4.5 Article

SiC-based porous ceramic carriers for heat-conductive phase change materials through carbothermal reduction method

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijac.13639

关键词

iron tailings; porous materials; reaction sintering; reduction; silicon carbide; thermal conductivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772020, 51872022]
  2. Beijing Government Funds for the Constructive Project of Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study prepared porous ceramics with high silicon carbide content using iron tailings through carbothermal reduction sintering process and improved the thermal conductivity. The carbothermal reduction of SiO(2) occurs above 1300 degrees C, generating liquid phase to enhance porosity.
Iron tailings remain the environment-damaging waste from the iron ore, and high porosity porous ceramics are an attractive material to turn waste into treasure. To improve the thermal conductivity, porous ceramics with high silicon carbide content have been prepared by carbothermal reduction sintering process using argillaceous fine-grained iron tailings with high silica content. The carbothermal reduction reaction mechanism and the components and properties of samples in sintering process are investigated. The results show that reaction components in the tailings are mainly SiO(2)and Fe(2)O(3)and liquid phase is generated rapidly between 1200 degrees C and 1300 degrees C, producing foaming effect and significantly improving the porosity. Moreover carbothermal reduction of SiO(2)occurs above 1300 degrees C. After sintering at 1600 degrees C for 2 hours, the apparent porosity and thermal conductivity of porous iron tailing ceramics are 81.1% and 0.58 W/(m center dot K), respectively. Compared with the ordinary porous iron tailing ceramics with the same porosity, the thermal conductivity of those herein is increased by 6.6 times. This study is instructive for the development of low-cost preparation technology of phase change material carriers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据