4.7 Article

Association of serum macrophage-mannose receptor CD206 with mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106732

关键词

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; Acute exacerbation; Macrophage; Soluble mannose receptor; Soluble CD163

资金

  1. Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development [BE2016611]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81670058, 81970063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) is attracting considerable attention due to disease acceleration and substantial mortality. Macrophages are known to regulate the fibrotic process in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Objective: We investigated if two new macrophage-specific serum biomarkers, soluble mannose receptor (MR, sCD206) and soluble CD163 (sCD163), increased in serum obtained from patients with AE-IPF compared to stable IPF (S-IPF). Methods: A total of 36 IPF patients with AE status, 54 IPF patients with stable status, and 27 normal controls were enrolled in this study. The levels of serum sCD206 and sCD163 were compared among the three groups and analysed with the clinical features and mortality of IPF. Results: The serum concentrations of both markers were higher in patients with AE-IPF than in those with S-IPF (580.0 ng/ml vs 335 ng/ml for sCD206 and 69.2 ng/ml vs 37.9 ng/ml for sCD163). The level of sCD206 was related to an increased risk of mortality (HR = 1.002, p < 0.001). The best separation between decedents and survivors was obtained by sCD206 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.712 and 95% confidence interval 0.595-0.830). Conclusion: Our data demonstrated that the macrophage-related markers sCD206 and sCD163 were significantly higher in patients with IPF, especially sCD206 in AE-IPF patients. The high level of serum sCD206 was associated with mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据