4.6 Article

Long-term performance and metagenomic analysis of full-scale anaerobic granular sludge bioreactors for low aerobically-biodegradable synthetic fiber manufacturing wastewater treatment

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2020.105046

关键词

Full-scale high-rate bioreactor; Fiber manufacturing wastewater treatment; External circulation sludge bed; Metagenomic analysis; Anaerobic granular sludge; Biodegradation

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 108-2221-E-035-057, MOST 109-2221-E-035-027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthetic fiber manufacturing wastewater (FMW) contained large amounts of tetrahydrofuran (THF), 3-buten-1-ol (BDO) and 1,4-butanediol (BTO) and showed a high chemical oxygen demand (COD) of 7,992 +/- 2,252 mg L-1. Ratio of the biological oxygen demand (BOD5) and COD of the FMW stream was analyzed as only 0.094, which reflected the low aerobically biodegradable property. For complementing existed aerobic biological treatment process, an external circulation sludge bed (ECSB) system consisting of two full-scale anaerobic granular sludge (AnGS) bioreactors was constructed and continuous operation for more than 25 months. Even though feed fluctuations occurred, robust performance of the system was exhibited with consistent high removals of COD (85.5 +/- 4.4%), THF (79.8 +/- 8.6%), BDO and BTO (both 100%). Fractionation analyses of AnGS at nine heights of the two bioreactors showed that the bigger size (>0.5 mm) dominated at the bottom (>92.1%). Morphology and elemental analyses of AnGS were helpful to see surface depositions in line with water analyses. Anaerobic biodegradations were also highlighted in a comprehensive analysis of carbon and nitrogen fractions, phosphates, sulfates and other minerals. Moreover, metagenomic analyses revealed Methanomicrobia and Methanosaeta in archaea and Exilispira in bacteria were the dominant genera in microbial community structure, which given more insights of anaerobic biodegradation in the two full-scale bioreactors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据