4.6 Review

Invasive candidiasis in critical care: challenges and future directions

期刊

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
卷 46, 期 11, 页码 2001-2014

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06240-x

关键词

Critical care; Candidiasis; Fungal; Biomarkers; Antifungal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Invasive candidiasis is the most common critical care-associated fungal infection with a crude mortality of similar to 40-55%. Important factors contributing to risk of invasive candidiasis in ICU include use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, immunosuppressive drugs, and total parenteral nutrition alongside iatrogenic interventions which breach natural barriers to infection [vascular catheters, renal replacement therapy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), surgery]. This review discusses three key challenges in this field. The first is the shift inCandidaepidemiology across the globe to more resistant non-albicansspecies, in particular, the emergence of multi-resistantCandida glabrataandCandida auris,which pose significant treatment and infection control challenges in critical care. The second challenge lies in the timely and appropriate initiation and discontinuation of antifungal therapy. Early antifungal strategies (prophylaxis, empirical and pre-emptive) using tools such as theCandidacolonisation index, clinical prediction rules and fungal non-culture-based tests have been developed: we review the evidence on implementation of these tools in critical care to aid clinical decision-making around the prescribing and cessation of antifungal therapy. The third challenge is selection of the most appropriate antifungal to use in critical care patients. While guidelines exist to aid choice, this heterogenous and complex patient group require a more tailored approach, particularly in cases of acute kidney injury, liver impairment and for patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We highlight key research priorities to overcome these challenges in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据