4.2 Article

A flexible robotic cell for in-process inspection of multi-pass welds

期刊

INSIGHT
卷 62, 期 9, 页码 526-532

出版社

BRITISH INST NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING
DOI: 10.1784/insi.2020.62.9.526

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) as part of the Nuclear Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre (AMRC)'s SIMPLE project - part of the BEIS Nuclear Innovation Programme
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/L022125/1, EP/N018427/1, EP/R004889/1, ANRC 12-1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/P030165/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Welds are currently only inspected after all the passes are complete and after allowing sufficient time for any hydrogen cracking to develop, typically over several days. Any defects introduced between passes are therefore unreported until fully buried, greatly complicating rework and also delaying early corrections to the weld process parameters. In-process inspection can provide early intervention but involves many challenges, including operation at high temperatures with significant gradients affecting acoustic velocities and, hence, beam directions. Reflections from the incomplete parts of the weld would also be flagged as lack-of-fusion defects, requiring the region of interest (ROI) to adapt as the weld is built up. The collaborative SIMPLE (Single Manufacturing PLatform Environment) project addresses these challenges by incorporating robotic inspection within a robotic tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding cell. This has been accomplished initially with commercial off-the-shelf ultrasonic phased arrays, but is flexible enough to adapt to future developments with solutions suitable for higher temperatures. The welding and inspection robots operate autonomously. The former can introduce deliberate defects to validate the latter, which uses 5 MHz 64-element phased arrays on high-temperature wedges to generate sector scans after each weld pass. The results are presented, confirming that the challenges have been addressed and demonstrating the feasibility of this approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据