4.7 Article

Synthesis of Novel Dinuclear N-Substituted 4-(Dimethylamino)benzaldehyde Thiosemicarbazonates of Rhenium(I): Formation of Four- and/or Five-Membered Chelate Rings, Conformational Analysis, and Reactivity

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 59, 期 19, 页码 14101-14117

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c01887

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund, ERDF (EU)
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (Spain) [PID2019-110218RB-I00, CTQ2017-90802-REDT]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reaction of fac-[ReX(CH3CN)(2)(CO)(3)] (X = Cl, Br) with N-phenyl-[4-(dimethylamino)benzaldehyde] thiosemicarbazone (HLA) or N-4-methoxybenzyl-[4-(dimethylamino)benzaldehyde] thiosemicarbazone (HLB) under controlled synthetic conditions gave 4 mononuclear [ReX(HL)(CO)(3)] (X = Cl, Br) and 16 dinuclear [Re2L2(CO)(6)] compounds. These complexes were obtained as single crystals, and their structures were established by X-ray diffraction. The structural study of these dimers showed the formation of several solvates, the presence of linkage isomerism, and the stabilization of four- and/or five-membered chelate rings. The different ligand coordination modes (a new mu-kappa(2)-S,N2:kappa-N3 coordination mode for a thiosemicarbazone ligand was observed), the conformation of the thiosemicarbazone chain in each case, the formal symmetry of the dimers, and the role of the synthetic procedure in the stability of the different chelate rings were analyzed and are discussed. Theoretical calculations in the gas phase were performed for the dimers with the HLA ligand in order to identify the thermodynamically most stable species. The behavior and structural stability of dimers in dimethyl sulfoxide and acetone solutions was investigated by H-1 NMR spectroscopy. The strength of the Re-I-L bond in solution was evidenced by the formation of [Re-2(L-NO2)(2)(CO)(6)] and [Re(L-A)(py)(CO)(3)] upon reaction of the corresponding dimer with concentrated nitric acid and pyridine, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据