4.7 Article

Utilization of enzymatic hydrolysate from corn stover as a precursor to synthesize an eco-friendly plywood adhesive

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112501

关键词

Enzymatic hydrolysate; Corn stover; Eco-friendly adhesive; Plywood; Saccharide

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180772]
  2. Natural Science Fund for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province [19KJB220010]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M661853]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, concentrated enzymatic hydrolysate (EH) from corn stover and ammonium dihydrogen phosphate (ADP) were exploited as feedstocks to prepare a novel environment-friendly plywood adhesive. Firstly, the optimal synthesis conditions of the enzymatic hydrolysate-ammonium dihydrogen phosphate (EHADP) adhesive were investigated, and the results manifested that optimizing mass proportion between EH (solids) and ADP, synthesis temperature and time were 90/10, 100 degrees C and 1 h, respectively. When using EHADP synthesized under optimal synthesis conditions, the wet bond strength of the plywood met the requirements of China National Standard GB/T 9846-2015 (wet shear strength >= 0.7 MPa). The chemical transformations during synthesis treatment on the uncured EHADP adhesive were analyzed by HPLC and C-13 NMR, which showed that the EHADP adhesive was a complex mixture of ketones, monosaccharides, 5-HMF, furfural, deoxyfructosazine, Schiff bases, and amides. In addition, ATR FT-IR and Py-GC/MS were employed to analyze the curing mechanism of EHADP adhesive. The results showed that cured EHADP was formed mainly due to the polymerization of furan compounds, and the network was linked by imine linkages and dimethylene ether bridges. TG and DSC analysis showed that the mass degradation and endothermic reaction occurred at around 135., indicating the EHADP adhesive which prepared under the optimal synthesis conditions could cured at lower temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据