4.6 Article

Effectiveness of portable HEPA air cleaners on reducing indoor PM2.5 and NH3 in an agricultural cohort of children with asthma: A randomized intervention trial

期刊

INDOOR AIR
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 454-466

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ina.12753

关键词

asthma; children; HEPA cleaners; NH; PM2; 5>; randomized trial

资金

  1. NIEHS [5R01ES023510, P30ES007033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study conducted in Yakima Valley evaluated the impact of HEPA air purifiers in reducing PM2.5 levels in homes of children with asthma, showing significant reductions in PM2.5 concentrations but not in NH3 levels.
We conducted a randomized trial of portable HEPA air cleaners with pre-filters designed to also reduce NH3 in non-smoking homes of children age 6-12 with asthma in Yakima Valley (Washington, USA). Participants were recruited through the Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic asthma education program. All participants received education on home triggers while intervention families additionally received two HEPA cleaners (child's sleeping area, main living area). Fourteen-day integrated samples of PM2.5 and NH3 were measured at baseline and one-year follow-up. We fit ANCOVA models to compare follow-up concentrations in HEPA vs control homes, adjusting for baseline concentrations. Seventy-one households (36 HEPA, 35 control) completed the study. Most were single-family homes, with electric heat and stove, A/C, dogs/cats, and mean (SD) 5.3 (1.8) occupants. In the sleeping area, baseline geometric mean (GSD) PM2.5 was 10.7 (2.3) mu g/m(3) (HEPA) vs 11.2 (1.9) mu g/m(3) (control); in the living area, it was 12.5 (2.3) mu g/m(3) (HEPA) vs 13.6 (1.9) mu g/m(3) (control). Baseline sleeping area NH3 was 62.4 (1.6) mu g/m(3) (HEPA) vs 65.2 (1.8) mu g/m(3) (control). At follow-up, HEPA families had 60% (95% CI, 41%-72%; p < .0001) and 42% (19%-58%; p = .002) lower sleeping and living area PM2.5, respectively, consistent with prior studies. NH3 reductions were not observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据