4.5 Article

Enhancing Kangaroo Mother Care Uptake Through Implementation of an Education Protocol

期刊

INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 88, 期 6, 页码 544-549

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s12098-020-03537-z

关键词

Preterm neonate; Kangaroo mother care uptake; Exclusive breastfeeding; Implementation; Education protocol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The implementation of a KMC education protocol resulted in earlier initiation and longer duration of KMC, higher proportion of eligible preterms receiving KMC in the NICU and at home, as well as more family members providing KMC.
Objectives Kangaroo mother care (KMC) uptake is low despite KMC being an evidence based tool to decrease neonatal mortality. It is important that local strategies be developed to enhance KMC usage. This study aimed to assess the effect of implementing an education protocol on the usage of KMC in the NICU and at home after discharge. Methods Preterm mother-infant dyads admitted to the NICU were enrolled prospectively. In initial 3 mo, baseline data on KMC usage in the unit and at home after discharge was collected. In the next three months, a KMC education protocol consisting of one-to-one counseling, education and sensitization of the mother and family members regarding benefits and procedure of KMC and focussed group discussions was implemented such that it became a unit work protocol. In the next 3 mo, data on KMC usage in the unit and at home after discharge was again collected and compared with the baseline data. Results Implementation of the education protocol resulted in earlier initiation of KMC (2.49 +/- 0.67 vs. 4.65 +/- 0.99 d,p < 0.05); increased duration of KMC (8 h/d vs. 3 h/d,p < 0.05); a higher proportion of eligible preterms receiving KMC during hospital stay (100% vs. 75%,p < 0.05) and at home (87% vs. 28%,p < 0.05) and KMC being provided more often by other family members (27.1% vs. 5.7%,p < 0.05). Conclusions Implementation of a KMC education protocol resulted in improved KMC usage in the unit and at home 4 wk after discharge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据