4.3 Article

One-step genome editing of porcine zygotes through the electroporation of a CRISPR/Cas9 system with two guide RNAs

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11626-020-00507-9

关键词

IL2RG; GHR; CRISPR; Cas9; Electroporation; Pig

资金

  1. Program of Open Innovation Platform with Enterprises, Research Institute and Academia (OPERA) from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) [JPMJOP1613]
  2. KAKENHI grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [JP17H03938, JP18K12062, JP19K16014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, we investigated whether electroporation could be used for one-step multiplex CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing, targetingIL2RGandGHRin porcine embryos. First, we evaluated and selected guide RNAs (gRNAs) by analyzing blastocyst formation rates and genome editing efficiency. This was performed in embryos electroporated with one of three different gRNAs targetingIL2RGor one of two gRNAs targetingGHR. No significant differences in embryo development rates were found between control embryos and those subjected to electroporation, irrespective of the target gene. Two gRNAs targetingIL2RG(nos. 2 and 3) contributed to an increased biallelic mutation rate in porcine blastocysts compared with gRNA no. 1. There were no significant differences in the mutation rates between the two gRNAs targetingGHR. In our next experiment, the mutation efficiency and the development of embryos simultaneously electroporated with gRNAs targetingIL2RGandGHRwere investigated. Similar embryo development rates were observed between embryos electroporated with two gRNAs and control embryos. WhenIL2RG-targeting gRNA no. 2 was used withGHR-targeting gRNAs no. 1 or no. 2, a significantly higher double biallelic mutation rate was observed than withIL2RG-targeting gRNA no. 3. In conclusion, we demonstrate the feasibility of using electroporation to transfer multiple gRNAs and Cas9 into porcine zygotes, enabling the double biallelic mutation of multiple genes with favorable embryo survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据