4.5 Review

Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review

期刊

IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01046-3

关键词

Systematic review; Dissemination; Dissemination science; Social policy; Public policy

资金

  1. pre-doctoral Clinical and Translational Science Fellowship [NIH TL1 TR001858]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Office of Academic Affiliations
  3. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion at the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System
  4. National Cancer Institute [P50CA244431]
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [U48DP006395]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Research has the potential to influence US social policy; however, existing research in this area lacks a coherent message. The Model for Dissemination of Research provides a framework through which to synthesize lessons learned from research to date on the process of translating research to US policymakers. Methods The peer-reviewed and grey literature was systematically reviewed to understand common strategies for disseminating social policy research to policymakers in the United States. We searched Academic Search Premier, PolicyFile, SocINDEX, Social Work s, and Web of Science from January 1980 through December 2019. Articles were independently reviewed and thematically analyzed by two investigators and organized using the Model for Dissemination of Research. Results The search resulted in 5225 titles and abstracts for inclusion consideration. 303 full-text articles were reviewed with 27 meeting inclusion criteria. Common sources of research dissemination included government, academic researchers, the peer reviewed literature, and independent organizations. The most frequently disseminated research topics were health-related, and legislators and executive branch administrators were the most common target audience. Print materials and personal communication were the most common channels for disseminating research to policymakers. There was variation in dissemination channels by level of government (e.g., a more formal legislative process at the federal level compared with other levesl). Findings from this work suggest that dissemination is most effective when it starts early, galvanizes support, uses champions and brokers, considers contextual factors, is timely, relevant, and accessible, and knows the players and process. Conclusions Effective dissemination of research to US policymakers exists; yet, rigorous quantitative evaluation is rare. A number of cross-cutting strategies appear to enhance the translation of research evidence into policy. Registration Not registered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据