4.4 Article

Hybrid IPT system with natural CC-CV output characteristics for EVs battery charging applications

期刊

IET POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 13, 期 16, 页码 3734-3743

出版社

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-pel.2020.0563

关键词

compensation; electric vehicles; battery powered vehicles; frequency control; battery chargers; coils; secondary cells; inductive power transmission; hybrid IPT system; natural CC-CV output characteristics; EVs battery charging applications; transmitter coil; series compensation; receiver coils; LCL compensation; maximum output power; battery equivalent load; IPT coils; required battery charging profile; power 3; 3 kW

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To charge the battery of electric vehicles (EVs), inductive power transfer (IPT) system has been considered to be more appropriate than traditional plug-in system especially for its security and convenience. This study proposes a hybrid IPT system for EVs charging applications adopting one transmitter coil with series compensation and two receiver coils with series compensation and LCL compensation. With the help of the two receiver coils and proper parameters design, the proposed system can naturally obtain constant current (CC) and constant voltage (CV) outputs and the maximum output power can be naturally limited which can prevent the system from possible overload. Therefore, the reliability of the proposed system is increased. Since the mode switching process can be automatically realised according to the value of battery equivalent load without extra control strategy and circuit, the fixed-frequency control can be used. Therefore, not only zero phase angle condition, but also the soft switching can be achieved. The theoretical analysis is presented with the design process of the IPT coils and resonance parameters for required battery charging profile. The performance of the system is verified by a 3.3 kW experimental prototype. The experimental results coincide well with the theoretical analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据