4.7 Article

ColorMapGAN: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation Using Color Mapping Generative Adversarial Networks

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.2980417

关键词

Training; Remote sensing; Image segmentation; Training data; Semantics; Image color analysis; Generative adversarial networks; Convolutional neural networks (CNNs); dense labeling; domain adaptation; generative adversarial networks (GANs); semantic segmentation

资金

  1. ACRI-ST
  2. Centre national d'etudes spatiales (CNES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the various reasons, such as atmospheric effects and differences in acquisition, it is often the case that there exists a large difference between the spectral bands of satellite images collected from different geographic locations. The large shift between the spectral distributions of training and test data causes the current state-of-the-art supervised learning approaches to output unsatisfactory maps. We present a novel semantic segmentation framework that is robust to such a shift. The key component of the proposed framework is color mapping generative adversarial networks (ColorMapGANs) that can generate fake training images that are semantically exactly the same as training images, but whose spectral distribution is similar to the distribution of the test images. We then use the fake images and the ground truth for the training images to fine-tune the already trained classifier. Contrary to the existing generative adversarial networks (GANs), the generator in ColorMapGAN does not have any convolutional or pooling layers. It learns to transform the colors of the training data to the colors of the test data by performing only one elementwise matrix multiplication and one matrix-addition operation. Due to the architecturally simple but powerful design of ColorMapGAN, the proposed framework outperforms the existing approaches with a large margin in terms of both accuracy and computational complexity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据