4.7 Article

Joint Classification of Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Using Hierarchical Random Walk and Deep CNN Architecture

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.2982064

关键词

Feature extraction; Laser radar; Hyperspectral imaging; Convolution; Probability distribution; Convolutional neural network (CNN); hyperspectral image (HSI); multisensor data fusion; hierarchical random walk

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61421001, 91638201, 61922013, 61571033, U1833203]
  2. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Earth observation using multisensor data is drawing increasing attention. Fusing remotely sensed hyperspectral imagery and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data helps to increase application performance. In this article, joint classification of hyperspectral imagery and LiDAR data is investigated using an effective hierarchical random walk network (HRWN). In the proposed HRWN, a dual-tunnel convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture is first developed to capture spectral and spatial features. A pixelwise affinity branch is proposed to capture the relationships between classes with different elevation information from LiDAR data and confirm the spatial contrast of classification. Then in the designed hierarchical random walk layer, the predicted distribution of dual-tunnel CNN serves as global prior while pixelwise affinity reflects the local similarity of pixel pairs, which enforce spatial consistency in the deeper layers of networks. Finally, a classification map is obtained by calculating the probability distribution. Experimental results validated with three real multisensor remote sensing data demonstrate that the proposed HRWN significantly outperforms other state-of-the-art methods. For example, the two branches CNN classifier achieves an accuracy of 88.91 on the University of Houston campus data set, while the proposed HRWN classifier obtains an accuracy of 93.61, resulting in an improvement of approximately 5.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据