4.7 Article

Graph-Based Blind Hyperspectral Unmixing via Nonnegative Matrix Factorization

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.2976799

关键词

Hyperspectral imaging; Laplace equations; Correlation; Sparse matrices; Spectral analysis; Signal processing algorithms; Blind source separation; graph signal processing~(GSP); hyperspectral image (HSI); HSI unmixing; nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperspectral unmixing (HU) is a crucial step in the hyperspectral image (HSI) analysis. It aims at decomposing the observed spectrum at each pixel into a collection of constituent endmembers, weighted by their abundances. In a close spatial neighborhood, due to spatial autocorrelation, the abundances of an endmember tend to be similar to each other. Therefore, the spectra at the neighboring pixels are also very much alike. Recently, many studies have focused on graph-regularized nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) approaches to address the blind HU problem. This is mainly because graph structures allow spatial-spectral relations to be effectively embedded in the NMF framework. This article takes one step further by defining each abundance map as a signal on a suitable graph, which enables the HU problem to be analyzed for the first time from a graph signal processing perspective. This article introduces a novel Laplacian regularizer based on the l1-norm, where graph spectral analysis is utilized to show that the regularizer has natural piecewise smooth (PWS) signal promotion and noise rejection capabilities. A graph-based blind HU algorithm is developed by incorporating this regularizer and an l1/2-abundance sparsity constraint into the NMF problem. Since the featured regularizer exploits the PWS property of abundance maps, the proposed method is effective in HU. The experiments conducted on synthetic and real HSIs demonstrate that it has superior performance compared with several popular HU algorithms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据