4.7 Article

Study on a Fast Solver for Poisson's Equation Based on Deep Learning Technique

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
卷 68, 期 9, 页码 6725-6733

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2020.2985172

关键词

Computational modeling; Mathematical model; Permittivity; Poisson equations; Machine learning; Convolutional neural networks; Two dimensional displays; Convolutional neural network (ConvNet); deep learning; finite-difference method (FDM); learning capacity; Poisson's equation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [61571264, 61971263]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC0603604]
  3. Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan [201804010266]
  4. Beijing Innovation Center for Future Chip
  5. Research Institute of Tsinghua, Pearl River Delta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fast and efficient computational electromagnetic simulation is a long-standing challenge. In this article, we propose a data-driven model to solve Poisson's equation that leverages the learning capacity of deep learning techniques. A deep convolutional neural network (ConvNet) is trained to predict the electric potential with different excitations and permittivity distribution in 2-D and 3-D models. With a careful design of cost function and proper training data generated from finite-difference solvers, the proposed network enables a reliable simulation with significant speedup and fairly good accuracy. Numerical experiments show that the same ConvNet architecture is effective for both 2-D and 3-D models, and the average relative prediction error of the proposed ConvNet model is less than 3% in both 2-D and 3-D simulations with a significant reduction in computation time compared to the finite-difference solver. This article shows that deep neural networks have a good learning capacity for numerical simulations. This could help us to build some fast solvers for some computational electromagnetic problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据