4.7 Article

High-Gain Circular Patch Antenna and Array With Introduction of Multiple Shorting Pins

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
卷 68, 期 9, 页码 6506-6515

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2020.2983793

关键词

Pins; Integrated circuit modeling; Resonant frequency; Patch antennas; Gain; Antenna arrays; Array; circular patch antenna; gain enhancement; shorting pins

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61725102, 61901179]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M652894]
  3. National Key Laboratory Foundation [614211182311]
  4. Opening Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Millimeter Wave [K202020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes gain-enhanced circular patch antenna and array with introduction of multiple shorting pins. The antenna consists of a circular patch and several shorting pins. Equivalent inductance is brought to the patch after introducing shorting pins. Thus, resonance of the patch shifts at higher frequency. Compared to a conventional circular patch without any pins, radiation area of the proposed patch is enlarged given the same resonance frequency, hence leads to gain enhancement. The number of pins introduced to a circular patch can be set freely due to its symmetrical feature. Moreover, surface current is restricted within a small area around the center of the patch after introducing multiple pins, leading to more concentrated radiation. An equivalent circuit model is built for the proposed antenna. Layout and number optimization rules for introducing shorting pins are formulated. With these rules, gain of a circular patch can be maximized for the applications under certain size restrictions. A prototype operating at 5.8 GHz is designed and fabricated. Furthermore, a 2*2 array based on the gain-enhanced circular patch elements is implemented. In the measurements, high gain, high efficiency, and narrowed half-power beamwidth of the patch antenna and the array are observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据