4.6 Article

Piezoelectric Energy-Harvesting Interface Using Split-Phase Flipping-Capacitor Rectifier With Capacitor Reuse for Input Power Adaptation

期刊

IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS
卷 55, 期 8, 页码 2106-2117

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSSC.2020.2989873

关键词

Capacitor reuse; maximum output power improving rate (MOPIR); multiple-voltage-conversion ratio (MVCR); piezoelectric energy harvesting (PEH); split-phase flipping-capacitor rectifier (SPFCR); switched-capacitor dc-dc converter

资金

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR [0069/2016/A2]
  2. University of Macau [MYRG2018-00196-AMSV]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a split-phase flipping-capacitor rectifier (SPFCR) to resolve the hard tradeoff between the number of capacitors and the energy-extraction efficiency for capacitive piezoelectric energy-harvesting (PEH) interfaces. By splitting the capacitor usage into multiple phases, this article can achieve the most number of flipping phases using the same number of capacitors when compared with the state of the art. We also relaxed the implementation complexity by removing insignificant SFPCR flipping phases without sacrificing the energy-harvesting efficiency. To improve further the input power adaptation, the flipping capacitors are reconfigured as a multiple-voltage-conversion-ratio (MVCR) switched-capacitor dc-dc converter during the non-flipping period without using extra passives. Maximum-power-point tracking (MPPT) is also accomplished using the full-bridge rectifier (FBR) fractional open-circuit voltage (V-OC,V-FBR) to relax the voltage-tolerance requirements. Fabricated in 0.18-mu m CMOS, the proposed 21-phase SPFCR PEH interface demonstrates a measured maximum output power improving rate (MOPIR) of up to 9.3x with V-D = 0.12 V (6.5x with V-D = 0 V) when compared with the conventional FBR interface over an equivalent FBR input power range (P-in,P- FBR) from 0.15 to 5.57 mu W.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据