4.5 Article

Style and intensity of hydration among C-complex asteroids: A comparison to desiccated carbonaceous chondrites

期刊

ICARUS
卷 348, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113826

关键词

Spectroscopy; Meteorites; Asteroids; Surfaces; Thermal alteration

资金

  1. Universite Grenoble Alpes (UGA) (IRS IDEX/UGA)
  2. European Research Council [SOLARYS ERC-CoG2017-771691]
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [JP17K05636, JP19H00725]
  4. OSUG@2020 Labex [ANR10 LABX56]
  5. 'Europlanet 2020 RI' within the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [654208]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we report a comparison between reflectance spectroscopy of meteorites under asteroidal environment (high vacuum and temperature) and Main Belt and Near Earth Asteroids spectra. Focusing on the -OH absorption feature around 3 mu m, we show that the asteroidal environment induces a reduction of depth and width of the band, as well as a shift of the reflectance minimum. We then decompose the -OH feature into several components with a new model using Exponentially Modified Gaussians. Unlike previous studies, we confirme the link between these components, the aqueous alteration history and the amount of water molecules inside of the sample, using the shape of this spectral feature only. We then apply this deconvolution model to asteroids spectra which were obtained with a space-borne telescope and two space probes, and find a strong similarity with the components detected on meteorites, and among asteroids from a same type. Based on the conclusions drawn from our meteorites experiment, we suggest to use the 3-um band as a tracer of the alteration history of the small bodies. Using the 3-mu m band only, we show that Ryugu has been heavily altered by water, which is consistent with its parent body being covered with water ice, then went through a high temperature sequence, over 400 degrees C. We also point out that the 3-mu m band of Bennu shows signs of its newly discovered surface activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据