4.2 Article

Associations of Thyroid Hormones and Resting Heart Rate in Patients Referred to Coronary Angiography

期刊

HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH
卷 52, 期 12, 页码 850-855

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-1232-7292

关键词

thyroid hormones; cardiovascular; heart; epidemiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resting heart rate (RHR) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Thyroid hormones exert several effects on the cardiovascular system, but the relation between thyroid function and RHR remains to be further established. We evaluated whether measures of thyroid hormone status are associated with RHR in patients referred to coronary angiography. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxin (FT4), and RHR were determined in 2795 participants of the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) Study. Median (25th to 75th percentile) serum concentrations were 1.25 (0.76-1.92)mU/l for TSH, 4.8 (4.2-5.3)pmol/l for FT3 and 17.1 (15.4-19.0)pmol/l for FT4, and mean (+/- standard deviation) RHR was 68.8 (+/- 11.7) beats/min. Comparing the highest versus the lowest quartile, RHR (beats/min) was significantly higher in the fourth FT4 quartile [3.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.23-4.73; p <0.001] and in the fourth FT3 quartile (2.30, 95% CI: 1.06-3.55; p <0.001), but there was no significant difference for TSH quartiles. In multiple linear regression analyses adjusting for various potential confounders, FT3 and FT4 were significant predictors of RHR (p <0.001 for both). In subgroups restricted to TSH, FT3, and FT4 values within the reference range, both FT3 and FT4 remained significant predictors of RHR (p <0.001 for all). In conclusion, in patients referred to coronary angiography, FT3 and FT4 but not TSH were positively associated with RHR. The relationship between free thyroid hormones and RHR warrants further investigations regarding its diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据