4.5 Article

On the dynamics of eco-efficiency performance in the European Union

期刊

COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 336-350

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2015.07.018

关键词

Distribution dynamics; Efficiency; Energy; Environmental performance; European Union

资金

  1. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia
  2. European Regional Development Fund [MTM2010-19528, MTM2013-42323-P]
  3. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [ECO2014-55221-P]
  4. Universitat Jaume I [P1.182014-17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper evaluates the evolution of environmental performance in the context of the European Union (EU), over the period 1993-2010. The context is particularly relevant, due to the traditionally high concerns of the EU about these issues, which has triggered off several initiatives and regulations on environmental protection. In this setting, we conduct a two-stage analysis which develops environmental performance indicators in the first stage for each pair country-year, and evaluates its evolution in the second. More specifically, in the first stage we estimate specific efficiencies for three air-pollutants (CO(2)e, SO2, NOx), along with an eco-efficiency indicator, for which we use the slack-free directional distance functions in the Data Envelopment Analysis framework (as opposed to the more extended intensity ratios), whereas in the second stage we propose to using a model of explicit distribution dynamics which takes into account how the entire distributions of these indicators evolve. Our results indicate that the dynamics underlying the evolution of the indicators analyzed are indeed remarkable. Although the eco-efficiency indicator has improved over the last two decades, it has-been during the last decade when performance has shown a more convergent path. However, in the case of the more traditional indicators (CO(2)e, SO2, NOx) the abatement opportunities are still remarkable, especially in the case of SO2. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据