4.5 Article

Contributions Of Public Health, Pharmaceuticals, And Other Medical Care To US Life Expectancy Changes, 1990-2015

期刊

HEALTH AFFAIRS
卷 39, 期 9, 页码 1546-1556

出版社

PROJECT HOPE
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00284

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [T32-HS000055]
  3. Arnold Ventures
  4. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  5. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
  6. National Institutes of Health
  7. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association
  8. Health Care Service Corporation
  9. Ballad Health
  10. Peterson Center on HealthCare
  11. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  12. Commonwealth Fund
  13. Gary and Mary West Health Policy Center
  14. National Pharmaceutical Council
  15. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  16. State of Michigan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Life expectancy in the US increased 3.3 years between 1990 and 2015, but the drivers of this increase are not well understood. We used vital statistics data and cause-deletion analysis to identify the conditions most responsible for changing life expectancy and quantified how public health, pharmaceuticals, other (nonpharmaceutical) medical care, and other/unknown factors contributed to the improvement. We found that twelve conditions most responsible for changing life expectancy explained 2.9 years of net improvement (85 percent of the total). Ischemic heart disease was the largest positive contributor to life expectancy, and accidental poisoning or drug overdose was the largest negative contributor. Forty-four percent of improved life expectancy was attributable to public health, 35 percent was attributable to pharmaceuticals, 13 percent was attributable to other medical care, and -7 percent was attributable to other/unknown factors. Our findings emphasize the crucial role of public health advances, as well as pharmaceutical innovation, in explaining improving life expectancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据