4.5 Article

Decline in circulating viral and human tumor markers after resection of head and neck carcinoma

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hed.26444

关键词

carcinoma; cell-free DNA; DNA sequencing; human papillomavirus; tumor markers

资金

  1. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina
  2. National Cancer Institute [R21 CA22903]
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR002489]
  4. North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  5. University of North Carolina Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background DNA sequencing panels can quantify human and viral tumor markers in blood simultaneously. The study found that levels of cancer-specific markers decreased after surgical resection, providing a potential method to evaluate efficacy of interventions by tracking viral and human markers over time.
Background DNA sequencing panels can simultaneously quantify human and viral tumor markers in blood. We explored changes in levels of plasma tumor markers following surgical resection of head and neck carcinoma. Methods In preresection and postresection plasmas, targeted DNA sequencing quantified variants in 28 human cancer genes and levels of oncogenic pathogens (human papillomavirus [HPV], Epstein-Barr virus [EBV],Helicobacter pylori) from 21 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Results Preresection, 11 of 21 patients (52%) had detectable tumor markers in plasma, most commonlyTP53mutation or HPV genome. Several days postresection, levels fell to undetectable in 8 of 10 evaluable patients, while two high-stage patients retained circulating tumor markers. Conclusions Modern sequencing technology can simultaneously quantify human gene variants and oncogenic viral genomes in plasma. Falling levels of cancer-specific markers upon resection can help identify viral and human markers to track at subsequent timepoints as a means to evaluate efficacy of interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据