4.5 Article

Role of geotextiles pore size distribution in dewatering tests

期刊

GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 80-94

出版社

ICE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1680/jgein.20.00029

关键词

Geosynthetics; geotextiles; pore size distribution; dewatering test; flow rate; clogging

资金

  1. Geosynthetic Fellowships for Graduate Students (2018-2019), Geosynthetic Institute (GSI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the role of geotextile pore size distribution on flow rate using pressurized two-dimensional dewatering test (P2DT), showing that the pore size distribution of geotextiles played a role in effluent release with conditioned slurries.
For geotextile tube dewatering applications, several researchers have used one-dimensional dewatering tests to estimate soil piping and sediment retention by correlating geotextile pore openings (AOS, O-50-O-98) and sediment particle size (D-10-D-90). These results are of limited use in predicting the dewatering rate required to meet a specific standard in a full-scale geotextile tube application since, in the field, flow rate is more important than sediment piping or retention. To overcome some of the limitations, this study focused on evaluating the role of geotextile pore size distribution on flow rate using the pressurized two-dimensional dewatering test (P2DT) with unconditioned and conditioned slurries. In this test, the radial and axial flow can be measured independently, therefore enabling accurate assessment of the performance of geotextile tubes under actual full-scale field conditions. In this study, glacial rock dust was used as sediment, and 1-woven, 2-composite, 2-nonwoven and 1-natural nonwoven geotextiles were used in the dewatering tests. Twelve P2DT and 40 capillary flow tests were performed to evaluate the dewatering characteristics of geotextiles. The test results showed that the pore size distribution of geotextiles played a role in effluent release with conditioned slurries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据