4.6 Article

Evolutionary full-waveform inversion

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
卷 224, 期 1, 页码 306-311

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggaa459

关键词

Inverse theory; Waveform inversion; Computational seismology; Seismic tomography

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the EU's Horizon 2020 Framework Programme [714069]
  2. Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) [c13, s868]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a new approach to full-waveform inversion that allows for continuous assimilation of growing data volumes without the need to reinvert all data. Specifically designed for seismological applications, our method utilizes a dynamic mini-batch stochastic L-BFGS to sequentially add new data while maintaining convergence and consistency in model fit measurement.
We present a new approach to full-waveform inversion (FWI) that enables the assimilation of data sets that expand over time without the need to reinvert all data. This evolutionary inversion rests on a reinterpretation of stochastic Limited-memory Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (L-BFGS), which randomly exploits redundancies to achieve convergence without ever considering the data set as a whole. Specifically for seismological applications, we consider a dynamic mini-batch stochastic L-BFGS, where the size of mini-batches adapts to the number of sources needed to approximate the complete gradient. As an illustration we present an evolutionary FWI for upper-mantle structure beneath Africa. Starting from a 1-D model and data recorded until 1995, we sequentially add contemporary data into an ongoing inversion, showing how (i) new events can be added without compromising convergence, (ii) a consistent measure of misfit can be maintained and (iii) the model evolves over times as a function of data coverage. Though applied retrospectively in this example, our method constitutes a possible approach to the continuous assimilation of seismic data volumes that often tend to grow exponentially.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据