4.7 Article

Extended priority-based hybrid genetic algorithm for the less-than-container loading problem

期刊

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 227-236

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.03.030

关键词

Container loading; Less-than-container load; Genetic algorithm; Shipment priority

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [NSC 102-2221-E-007-057-MY3, MOST 103-2218-E-007-023, MOST 104-2622-E-007-002]
  2. Toward World Class University Project from the Ministry of Education, Taiwan [104N2074E1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The container loading problem has important industrial and commercial application in global logistics and supply chain management. In particular, small- and medium-sized enterprises may transport few items that cannot completely utilize the container space, called the less-than-container loading problem (LCL). To our best knowledge, few studies have addressed the present LCL problem. Furthermore, a freight forwarder in practice wants to optimize the space utilization in containers from different shippers, while avoiding the mixing of cargoes (boxes) from different customers to reduce the conflicts of loading and unloading goods in different ports. Focusing on realistic needs, this study aims to develop an extended priority-based hybrid genetic algorithm (EP-HGA) for the present LCL problem to determine the loading patterns. In particular, the proposed approach integrates the encoding based on cargo priority and cargo layer via the deepest-bottom-left fill method and the adaptive auto tuning parameters of the proposed EP-HGA to improve the efficiency and effectiveness. Numerical experiments were designed to compare the results of the proposed EP-HGA with conventional approaches for validation. The results have shown the practical viability of the proposed approach to effectively solve the LCL problem. This study concludes with a discussion of future research. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据