4.7 Article

Ordering and pricing model of retailers' preventive transshipment dominated by manufacturer with conditional return

期刊

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 24-33

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.07.024

关键词

Conditional return; Preventive transshipment; Ordering; Pricing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71272086, 71572020]
  2. National Social Science Foundation of China [15ZDB169]
  3. Educational Commission of Guizhou Province [2015SSD01]
  4. General Project Fund for Social Science & Humanities of Guizhou University [GDYB2015007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retailers often fail to implement the transshipment policy due to lack of the trust or information asymmetry among them in the process of transshipment, especially in the case that return becomes a norm. Therefore, we develop a framework about the preventive transshipment which is dominated by the manufacturer between two independent retailers to cope with the mismatch between demand and inventory. In this research, a two-period ordering and pricing model about the preventive transshipment with conditional return is formulated. To simplify the implementation of preventive transshipment, a dominant preventive transshipment policy is recommended at the beginning of the second period. So, one retailer may adjust the inventory without considering the impact of the other retailer's inventory quantity and the transshipment strategy. To analyze the mutual effect between two retailers, the existence and uniqueness of the ordering Nash Equilibrium and the optimal pricing policy is identified and analyzed. Furthermore, we obtain the relationship between the ordering quantity and transshipment price. Finally, a numerical analysis is carried out to examine the sensitivity of the transshipment price, wholesale price, ordering quantity, profit of the retailer and manufacture to the return rate. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据