4.7 Article

Experimental study of the effects of spark timing and water injection on combustion and emissions of a heavy-duty natural gas engine

期刊

FUEL
卷 276, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118025

关键词

Combustion characteristics; Emissions; Natural gas; Stoichiometric combustion; Water injection

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province, China [2019ZDLGY15-07]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [51806020]
  3. Youth Innovation Team of Shaanxi Universities
  4. Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges, Chang'an University, China [300102229104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The growing concern over global warming and stricter emissions regulations (EURO 6 standards) have led to natural gas engines being operated in stoichiometric combustion conditions with three-way catalytic (TWC) and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) equipment. However, natural gas engines suffer from high thermal load, knock onset, and high turbine inlet temperatures at stoichiometric combustion conditions. Water injection is a promising approach to reduce thermal load and NOx emissions and suppress knock onset. In this study, the effects of water injection on the combustion and performance characteristics of a heavy-duty natural gas engine were experimentally studied. The experiments were conducted with four water to natural gas mass ratios (WNMRs) and various spark timings. The results showed that water injection decreased the burning velocity of natural gas, leading to a decrease in peak in-cylinder pressure, peak heat release rate, and combustion temperature. The flame development period (CA(0-10)) and the flame propagation period (CA(10-90)) increased with an increase in WNMR. Compared to pure natural gas, the brake thermal efficiency at the optimum spark timing increased from 27.8% to 28.2% at WNMR = 0.35. BSNOx emissions consistently decreased with an increase in WNMR, while BSTHC emissions and BSCO emissions increased slightly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据