4.7 Article

Development of a highly compact and robust chemical reaction mechanism for the oxidation of tetrahydrofurans under engine relevant conditions

期刊

FUEL
卷 276, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118034

关键词

Tetrahydrofuran; 2-methyltetrahydrofuran; 2-buthyltetrahydrofuran; Ignition characteristics; Species mole fraction; Laminar flame speeds

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Singapore [WBS R-265-000-611-281]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents a compact and robust chemical reaction mechanism for modeling the combustion of saturated furans including tetrahydrofuran, 2-methyltetrahydrofuran and 2-buthyltetrahydrofuran under engine relevant conditions. A decoupling method is adopted to construct the mechanism. The oxidation reaction for the small species is described by a mature and detailed H-2/CO/C-1 sub-mechanism, based on which the skeletal submechanisms for tetrahydrofuran, 2-methyltetrahydrofuran and 2-buthyltetrahydrofuran are incorporated via a compact yet robust C-2-C-3 sub-mechanism. The sub-mechanisms for the three tetrahydrofuranic fuel components are selected from the detailed chemical mechanisms in the literature via a series of species rate of production analysis, sensitivity analysis, isomer lumping and reaction lumping. The Arrhenius pre-exponential A factors for these selected reaction pathways are then optimized via a single objective genetic algorithm. The resulting mechanism is rather compact consisting of only 56 species among 183 reactions. The performance of the developed mechanism for predicting the combustion chemistry for the three fuel components has been evaluated against the experimental measurements in the literature. Reasonable agreement between the predicted ignition delay times, speciation profiles and laminar flame speeds with the experimental data is achieved for all the cases considered, indicating the high accuracy and robustness of the developed mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据