4.7 Article

Impacts of forest management intensity on carbon accumulation of China's forest plantations

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 472, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118252

关键词

Carbon storage; Conterminous US; Soil erosion; Soil organic carbon; Tillage Primary Research Article; Planted forests; Forest management; Carbon uptake; Carbon stock

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2018YFC0507301]
  2. Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of NUIST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Characterized by young age and a large area been newly planted, China's forests were projected to have high carbon (C) uptake potential in the future. While such a potential assumes continuous human management, the effects of forest management on C uptake potential are less clear. Using surveyed data collected from a recent nationwide field campaign conducted between 2011 and 2015, we examined human management effects on C stock dynamics in three of the most widely planted forests in southern China, i.e. Pinus massoniana, Cunninghamia lanceolate, and Eucalyptus. Vegetation C accumulation rates were larger under higher management intensities in Pinus massoniana and Eucalyptus, while there was no such a pattern in Cunninghamia lanceolate. Human management has contributed to vegetation C increment by 2.42 Tg C yr(-1) and 0.55 Tg C yr(-1) in Pinus and Cunninghamia forests. While in comparison, human management impacts on C accumulation were not accountable in Eucalyptus due to lack of naturally regenerated forests. Moreover, we found that potential vegetation C accumulation can be enhanced by 7.86 Tg C yr(-1) from higher management intensity with 3.86, 2.17, and 1.83 Tg C yr(-1) from Pinus massoniana, Cunninghamia lanceolate, and Eucalyptus, respectively. We also advise that different management intensities should be considered to avoid biases for projection of future C sink from forest plantations regionally or nationally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据