4.7 Article

Development of an immuno-electrochemical glass carbon electrode sensor based on graphene oxide/gold nanocomposite and antibody for the detection of patulin

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 342, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128257

关键词

Glass carbon electrode; Graphene oxide/gold nanocomposite; IgG; Mycotoxin; Patulin

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea - Korean Government [NRF-2017R1A2B4007672, NRF-2020R1A6A1A03044512]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B4007672] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A glass carbon electrode (GCE) sensor has been developed for rapid and sensitive detection of patulin in foods. The sensor utilizes anti-patulin-BSA IgG immobilized on a GCE coated with a graphene oxide/gold nanocomposite to capture patulin in samples. The immuno-electrochemical GCE sensor can detect patulin in less than 1 minute with a detection limit of 5 μg/L.
The presence of fungal-produced patulin in foods poses a high health risk to people because it can cause neurologic and gastrointestinal illnesses. A glass carbon electrode (GCE) sensor was developed for the rapid and sensitive detection of patulin. Anti-patulin-BSA IgG of a rabbit was produced and immobilised on a GCE coated with a graphene oxide/gold nanocomposite. The mycotoxin patulin in the samples could be captured by the antipatulin-BSA IgG on the surface of the GCE sensor. The spatial hindrance effect of IgG on the GCE sensor was reduced by the reaction between IgG and patulin, resulting in a decrease in the electron transfer resistance. The current changes in the immobilised anti-patulin-BSA IgG GCE sensor exhibited a linear relationship with patulin concentration and facilitated the sensitive detection of patulin. This immuno-electrochemical GCE sensor could rapidly detect patulin in less than 1 min with a detection limit of 5 mu g/L.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据