4.4 Article

Identification of Edible Gelatin Origins by Data Fusion of NIRS, Fluorescence Spectroscopy, and LIBS

期刊

FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 525-536

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-020-01893-2

关键词

Data fusion; NIRS; Fluorescence spectroscopy; LIBS; Gelatin origins; Identification

资金

  1. Science and Technology Innovation Project of Henan Agricultural University [KJCX2018A09]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017 M612399]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671581]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the potential of data fusion of NIRS, fluorescence spectroscopy, and LIBS to improve identification accuracy of different origins of edible gelatin, demonstrating that the fusion of these methods can complement each other and enhance accuracy in discrimination of gelatin origins.
The potential for a data fusion of near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), fluorescence spectroscopy, and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) was investigated to improve the identification accuracy of different origins of edible gelatin (porcine skin, porcine bone, bovine skin, bovine bone, and fish skin). Competitive adaptive reweighted sampling method (CARSM) was applied to extract feature variables, and the feature variables from individual spectroscopic methods were combined to form the fused data. Then, random forest model (RFM) was built for classification of five origins of edible gelatin. The classification accuracy in the validation set for individual spectroscopic methods and the data fusion strategy were obtained as 97.1%, 98.55%, 81.16%, and 100%, respectively. Moreover, the precision, recall, andFscore for the data fusion method were all up to 100%, which are apparently higher than those for the individual spectroscopic methods. The results demonstrate that the data fusion of NIRS, fluorescence spectroscopy, and LIBS can complement each other and improve the accuracy for discrimination of gelatin origins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据