4.5 Article

Effect of chilled storage on sperm quality of basa catfish (Pangasius bocourti)

期刊

FISH PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 46, 期 6, 页码 2133-2141

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10695-020-00860-2

关键词

Basa catfish; Pangasius bocourti; Sperm quality; Chilled storage

资金

  1. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou [201804020013]
  2. Agriculture Research System of China [ARS-47]
  3. Program of the China-ASEAN Maritime Cooperation Fund of the Chinese government [42000-41170002]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31872572]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Basa catfish (Pangasius bocourti) is an indigenous species of the Lower Mekong River with increasing aquaculture value in Southeast Asia. Short-term semen storage has proven to be a valuable tool for assisted reproduction in fish, but little information is available on basa catfish. The present study was aimed at evaluating the effect of short-term semen storage on the sperm quality of basa catfish. Semen samples were kept at 4 degrees C for 7 days, either undiluted or diluted with Ca-F HBSS at different ratios (1:1, 1:3, and 1:6; semen:medium). Results showed that sperm quality was significantly affected by the time of chilled storage, characterized by a decline in sperm motility, viability, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), ATP content, and increased level of lipid peroxidation throughout the storage period. Compared with undiluted semen, diluted in Ca-F HBSS allowed better preservation of sperm quality during 7 days of chilled storage; dilution ratio at 1:1 was more effective than higher ratios (1:3 and 1:6) for prolonging sperm storability. In addition, sperm motility, viability, and ATP content decreased more rapidly than MMP, suggesting these indicators are more sensitive in detecting sperm damage of basa catfish during short-term chilled storage. These results obtained here will contribute to a better understanding of reproductive management in this species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据