4.5 Article

Assessment of RANS and DES methods for realistic automotive models

期刊

COMPUTERS & FLUIDS
卷 128, 期 -, 页码 1-15

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.01.008

关键词

Hybrid RANS-LES; DDES; Ahmed body; DrivAer; RANS; Separated flow; Automotive

资金

  1. N8 consortium
  2. EPSRC [EP/K000225/1]
  3. CD-adapco
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K000225/1, EP/K000209/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/K000209/1, EP/K000225/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a comprehensive investigation of RANS and DES models for the Ahmed car body and a realistic automotive vehicle; the DrivAer model. A variety of RANS models, from the 1-equation Spalart Allmaras model to a low-Reynolds number Reynolds Stress model have shown an inability to consistently correctly capture the flow field for both the Ahmed car body and DrivAer model, with the under-prediction of the turbulence in the initial separated shear layer found as a key deficiency. It has been shown that the use of a hybrid RANS-LES model (in this case, Detached Eddy Simulation) offers an advantage over RANS models in terms of the force coefficients, and general flow field for both the Ahmed car body and the DrivAer model. However, for both cases even at the finest mesh level hybrid RANS-LES methods still exhibited inaccuracies. Suggestions are made on possible improvements, in particular on the use of embedded LES with synthetic turbulence generation. Finally the computational cost of each approach is compared, which shows that whilst hybrid RANS-LES offer a clear benefit over RANS models for automotive relevant flows they do so at a much increased cost. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据