4.6 Article

Exploring the SSBreakome: genome-wide mapping of DNA single-strand breaks by next-generation sequencing

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 288, 期 13, 页码 3948-3961

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/febs.15568

关键词

DNA damage mapping; DNA single-strand breaks; genome stability; GLOE-Seq; next-generation sequencing; Nick-Seq; SSB-Seq; SSiNGLe

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG
  2. German Research Foundation) [393547839 - SFB 1361]
  3. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mapping the genome-wide distribution of single-strand breaks is crucial for understanding damage signaling and DNA repair. This article reviews classical and newly developed high-resolution methods for mapping single-strand breaks, highlighting the valuable insights they provide into the impact of this type of damage on the genome.
Mapping the genome-wide distribution of DNA lesions is key to understanding damage signalling and DNA repair in the context of genome and chromatin structure. Analytical tools based on high-throughput next-generation sequencing have revolutionized our progress with such investigations, and numerous methods are now available for various base lesions and modifications as well as for DNA double-strand breaks. Considering that single-strand breaks are by far the most common type of lesion and arise not only from exposure to exogenous DNA-damaging agents, but also as obligatory intermediates of DNA replication, recombination and repair, it is surprising that our insight into their genome-wide patterns, that is the 'SSBreakome', has remained rather obscure until recently, due to a lack of suitable mapping technology. Here we briefly review classical methods for analysing single-strand breaks and discuss and compare in detail a series of recently developed high-resolution approaches for the genome-wide mapping of these lesions, their advantages and limitations and how they have already provided valuable insight into the impact of this type of damage on the genome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据