4.5 Article

Fatigue crack growth determination based on cyclic plastic zone and cyclic J-integral in kinematic-isotropic hardening materials with considering Chaboche model

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ffe.13330

关键词

Chaboche model; cyclic J-integral; cyclic plastic zone; fatigue crack growth; isotropic hardening; kinematic hardening

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For many materials, plastic deformations under cyclic loadings differ from monotonic loading. Cyclic plastic zone with considering the strain hardening effects becomes complicated during unloading step. In this research, the effects of nonlinear kinematic and isotropic hardening behaviours on the cyclic plastic reaction around the crack tip for different conditions are investigated. For study of various hardening characteristics, as-received and annealed copper are tested under same symmetric cyclic loadings. The results indicate considerable isotropic hardening behaviour in annealed material. A Chaboche nonlinear hardening model was used to determine the hardening parameters. The cyclic plastic zone around the crack tip in C(T) specimen was measured by back stresses. The cyclic plastic zones are specified via variations of the back stresses in a cycle. The cyclic plastic zones predicted by Chaboche model are smaller than those for Irwin model because of the hardening effects. Also, Irwin model for prediction of the cyclic plastic zone size is modified with considering the cyclic plastic effects. According to the results, the cyclic plastic zone around the crack tip is almost constant in the same load range, and load ratio (R) has a slight effect on this zone. Whereas, for constant load range, cyclic J-integral ( increment J) is different for variousRvalues. For studying of the fatigue crack growth, two parameters of increment Jand cyclic plastic zone area were evaluated. These parameters can apply in fracture mechanics especially in elastic-plastic conditions with considering the cyclic plastic responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据