4.7 Article

Predicting stock movements based on financial news with segmentation

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 164, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113988

关键词

Stock prediction; Data mining; Machine learning; Heterogeneity; Cluster analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study develops a method combining K-means clustering and multiple kernel learning techniques for predicting stock price movements by analyzing news articles, which shows higher predictability than existing methods in the majority of cases. The results suggest the importance of cluster analysis in sectors with increasing heterogeneity, emphasizing the need for larger numbers of clusters as heterogeneity increases.
With the development of machine learning technologies, predicting stock movements by analyzing news articles has been studied actively. Most of the existing studies utilize only the datasets of target companies, and some studies use datasets of the relevant companies in the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) sectors. However, we show that GICS has a limitation in finding relevance regarding stock prediction because heterogeneity exists in the GICS sectors. To solve this limitation, we suggest a methodology that reflects heterogeneity and searches for homogeneous groups of companies which have high relevance. Stock price movements are predicted using the K-means clustering and multiple kernel learning technique which integrates information from the target company and its homogeneous cluster. We experiment using three-year data from the Republic of Korea and compare the results of the proposed method with those of existing methods. The results show that the proposed method shows higher predictability than existing methods in the majority of cases. The results also imply that the necessity of cluster analysis depends on the heterogeneity in the sector, and it is essential to perform cluster analysis with a larger number of clusters as the heterogeneity increases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据