4.5 Article

The therapeutic potential of PROTACs

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13543776.2021.1840553

关键词

Bifunctional molecules; protac; protein degradation; ubiquitin-proteasome system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PROTACs are a novel class of heterobifunctional molecules that can modulate target biology uniquely compared to inhibitors, with potential to develop new medicines for treating multiple diseases. Delivering on the huge potential of PROTACs will require the development of differentiated PROTAC medicines from traditional inhibitors, which will pose both opportunities and challenges in securing robust intellectual property.
Introduction: PROTACs represent a novel class of heterobifunctional molecules that simultaneously bind to a target protein and to an E3 ligase complex, resulting in the transfer of ubiquitin and initiating a process ultimately causing the proteasomal degradation of the target protein. This mechanism of action imbues PROTACs with the ability to modulate target biology in unique ways compared to inhibitors, and the development of PROTACs as therapeutic agents is expected to result in new medicines to treat multiple diseases. Areas covered: This review includes published PCT (WO) patent applications covering January 2013 through June 2020. Only English-language patent applications with exemplified PROTACs reported to degrade a target protein(s) were deemed in scope, and the definition of 'PROTAC' was restricted to a bifunctional molecule which contains a discrete binding element for a specific degradation target(s), as well as a separate discrete E3 ligase-binding moiety. Expert opinion: Delivering on the enormous potential of PROTACs will require the development of PROTAC medicines that are differentiated from traditional small-molecule inhibitors. The modular composition of PROTACs affords both opportunities and challenges in securing robust intellectual property, and we envision that requirements for novelty are likely to evolve as this area matures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据