4.2 Review

Pharmacological strategies to treat attacks of episodic migraine in adults

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 305-316

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1828347

关键词

Acute migraine therapy; delayed onset; tolerability; triptans; NSAIDs; lasmiditan; gepants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The delay in the onset of action of acute migraine drugs is a major obstacle in successful treatment, and further investigation into the mechanisms of this delay is crucial for improving efficacy. Non-oral administration of antimigraine drugs to achieve early absorption should be explored to potentially increase maximum effect.
Introduction Migraine patients prioritize early complete relief of headache and associated symptoms, sustained freedom of pain, and good tolerability. One major obstacle for the successful use of drug treatment of migraine attack is that the speed of action of triptans, 5-HT(1B/1D)receptor agonists, is delayed. Areas covered In this review, the author discusses the following features of acute migraine drugs: pharmacology; pharmacokinetics, and absorption of drugs during migraine attacks. Next, dose-response curves for effect; and the delayed onset of action is reviewed. In the more clinical part of the review, the following items are discussed: overall clinical judgments; comparison of triptans; comparison of triptans with NSAIDs; early intervention with triptans; medication-overuse headache; comments on the effect of gepants; and the general principle of acute migraine therapy. Expert opinion The delay in the onset of effect of acute migraine drugs is likely due to a complex antimigraine system involving more than one site of action. Investigations into the mechanisms of the delay should have a high priority, both in studies with animals, migraine models, and in migraine patients during attacks. Non-oral administration of antimigraine drugs resulting in early absorption of drugs should be developed as they possibly also can increase E-max.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据