4.7 Article

Quantitative evaluation of passive muscle stiffness by shear wave elastography in healthy individuals of different ages

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 3187-3194

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07367-7

关键词

Elasticity imaging techniques; Muscle; skeletal; Passive stretching; Healthy volunteers

资金

  1. Public Health Project of Futian District [FTWS2018049]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Project foundation [JCYJ20170817171836611]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that passive muscle stiffness increases with age, and the differences between age groups only become significant after reaching a certain degree of stretching.
Objectives To investigate age-related changes on passive muscle stiffness in healthy individuals and measure the shear modulus in different age groups. Methods Shear wave elastography (SWE) movies of gastrocnemius medialis (GM) were collected during passive stretching induced by ankle rotation from plantarflexion (PF) to dorsiflexion (DF). A series of SWE images at ankle angles of PF 40 degrees, PF 30 degrees, PF 20 degrees, PF 10 degrees, 0 degrees, DF 10 degrees, DF 20 degrees, and DF 30 degrees were collected and shear moduli measured accordingly for analyses. Results Eighty-six healthy volunteers (27 children, 31 middle-aged adults, and 28 older people) were recruited. No significant difference was observed in the shear modulus between the three groups at ankle angles of PF 40 degrees, PF 30 degrees, PF 20 degrees, PF 10 degrees, and 0 degrees (p> 0.05). The difference in the shear modulus among the three groups became significant as DF increased. At ankle angles of DF 10 degrees, DF 20 degrees, and DF 30 degrees, the shear modulus was the greatest in the older group, followed by the middle-aged group and then the children group (p= 0.007, 0.000, and 0.000, respectively). Conclusions Passive muscle stiffness increases with age, and the difference between age groups was pronounced only after reaching a certain degree of stretching.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据