4.7 Article

From irreversible to reversible covalent inhibitors: Harnessing the andrographolide scaffold for anti-inflammatory action

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112481

关键词

Andrographolide; Anti-inflammatory; Covalent inhibitor; Michael addition; Reversibility

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Singapore [R-184-000-269-592]
  2. Ministry of Education Singapore [R-148-000-241-114]
  3. MOE scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Covalent drugs with prolonged actions often show superior potency, yet integrated strategies for optimizing their structural and electronic features are lacking. Herein, we present our effort directed towards understanding the contribution of chemical reactivity to biological potency to rationally design new covalent inhibitors based on the ent-ladane andrographolide scaffold for anti-inflammatory action. Specifically, a series of andrographolide derivatives comprising various Michael acceptors was developed and their thiol reactivity was assayed under various chemical and biological conditions. The cell-based SAR studies permitted the assessment of the inhibitor efficacy in more complex systems, which were often limited in traditional covalent drug development using isolated proteins or peptides. Our in vitro study identified enone 17 as the most promising candidate which demonstrated potent anti-inflammatory activity and superior safety profiles as compared to the lead compound andrographolide. Its reversibility following a Michael addition reaction with biological thiols resulted in more predictable pharmacological responses. In addition, 17 exhibited good in vivo efficacy at doses as low as 0.3 mg/kg when tested in LPS-induced acute lung injury model. Given a good balance of chemical reactivity and biological potency, enone 17 potentially offers a new therapeutic option based on natural product chemistry for the management of inflammatory conditions. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据