4.6 Article

Gastric regurgitation predicts neurological outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 83, 期 -, 页码 54-57

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.08.010

关键词

Cardiac arrest; Gastric regurgitation; Neurological outcome

资金

  1. OENB [15959]
  2. Austrian Society of Cardiology
  3. Medical Scientific Fund of the Mayor of the City of Vienna [19061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that gastric regurgitation (GReg) on the first day after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) can serve as an early and independent predictor for poor neurological outcome in comatose OHCA survivors. Patients with GReg are more likely to have poor neurological outcomes, and this association can predict independently.
Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury can affect and disturb the autonomous nervous system (ANS), which regulates various visceral systems including the gastro-intestinal and emetic system. The present study aimed to analyze the predictive value of gastric regurgitation (GReg) for neurological outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors. In this prospective, single-center study, 79 OHCA survivors treated at a university-affiliated tertiary care centre were included and GReg was measured at the first day after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Neurological outcome was assessed by the Cerebral Performance Categories score at discharge. Seventy-six percent of the study population had a poor neurological outcome. GReg was found to be associated with poor neurological outcome with an adjusted OR of 5.37 (95% CI 1.41-20.46; p = 0.01). The area under the ROC curve for GReg was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.56-0.81) for poor neurological outcome. GReg on the first day after OHCA is an early, strong and independent predictor for poor neurological outcome in comatose OHCA survivors. These results are particularly compelling because measurement of GReg is inexpensive and routinely performed in critical care units.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据