4.6 Article

The 2020 International Society of Hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines - key messages and clinical considerations

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 1-6

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.09.001

关键词

Blood pressure; Hypertension; Guidelines; Myocardial infarction; Stroke; Heart failure; Chronic disease

资金

  1. Fondazione Umbra Cuore e Ipertensione-ONLUS, Perugia, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The International Society of Hypertension (ISH) has recently developed practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in adults aged >= 18 years. Conceptually, the 2020 ISH Guidelines are closer to the 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines rather than to the 2017 ACC/AHA Guidelines. The ISH Guidelines have two distinctive features when compared with the 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) Guidelines and the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Guidelines. First, they are written in a concise and easy-to-read style; second, they focuses on practical issues related to the management of hypertension in 'high-income' as well as in low-income' countries, where there is limited access to resources for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. In our opinion, the 2020 ISH Guidelines share with the 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines an important limitation which may impair the retention of these key aspects of Guidelines by physicians, with consequent difficult adoption in clinical practice. It consists in the definition of several blood pressure targets in relation to age, target organ damage and concomitant disease. We believe that results of randomized clinical trials and meta-analysis do not support the recommendation of differential BP targets, as well as of rigid 'safety boundaries'. This review critically examines similarities and differences across the three major Hypertension Guidelines, which include the definition of hypertension, drug treatment, and blood pressure targets, with emphasis on key messages relevant for clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据