4.5 Article

Secondary research use of personal medical data: attitudes from patient and population surveys in The Netherlands and Germany

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 495-502

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-00735-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01ZZ1805]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our studies indicate high acceptance of broad consent among Dutch patients and a similar attitude among German patients. Some Dutch patients are open to non-academic research use of their data, while a majority of the German public supports data donation as an alternative model. However, there is reluctance to allow industry access to donated data, highlighting the need for public discussion and education on the role of industry in medical research.
Making routine clinical-care-data available for medical research requires adequate consent to legitimize use and exchange. While, public interest in supporting medical research is increasing, individuals often find it difficult to actively enable researchers to access their data. In addition to broad consent, the idea of (consent-free) data donation has been brought into play as another way to legitimize secondary research use of medial data. However, flanking the implementation of broad consent policies or data donation, the attitude of patients, and the general public toward different aspects of these approaches needs to be assessed. We conducted two empirical studies to this end among Dutch patients (n = 7430) and representative German citizens (n = 1006). Wide acceptance of broad consent was observed among Dutch patients (92.3%), corroborating previous findings among German patients (93.0%). Moreover, 28.8% of the Dutch patients generally approved secondary data-use for non-academic research, 42.3% would make their decision dependent upon the type of institution in question. In the German survey addressing the general population, 78.8% approved data donation without explicit consent as an alternative model of legitimization, the majority of those who approved (96.7%) would allow donated data to be used by universities and public research institutions. This willingness to support contrasted sharply with the fact that only 16.6% would allow access to the data by industry. Our findings thus not only add empirical evidence to the debate about broad consent and data donation, but also suggest that widespread public discussion and education about the role of industry in medical research is necessary in that context.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据