4.2 Article

Weight-based mycophenolate mofetil dosing predicts acute GVHD and relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 106, 期 2, 页码 205-212

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13537

关键词

bone marrow transplantation; GVHD; MMF; relapse; umbilical cord blood

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute [P01 CA65493, P30 CA77598]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Higher weight-based MMF dose can reduce the risk of acute GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, but may increase the risk of relapse. This dose had no significant impact on engraftment, chronic GVHD, or survival. Prospective studies are needed to optimize MMF dosing after HCT.
Objectives Higher MMF dose can reduce acute GVHD risk after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We examined the effect of MMF dose, relative to patient actual body weight (mg/kg/day), on outcomes of 680 adults after HCT. Methods MMF was combined with cyclosporine (n = 599) or sirolimus (n = 81). We divided MMF dose/kg/day in quartiles. Results The median time to grade II-IV acute GVHD was 32 days. The incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD at day 30 was 30% in 1st (<29), 20% in 2nd (29-34), 16% in 3rd (35-41), and 19% in 4th (>= 42) quartile (P < .01). Corresponding relapse incidence at 1 year was 16%, 25%, 27%, and 31%, respectively (P = .01). In multivariate analysis, as compared to 1st quartile, higher dose of weight-based MMF reduced grade II-IV acute GVHD (HR = 0.64 for 2nd, HR = 0.48 for 3rd, and HR = 0.55 for 4th quartile), but increased the risk of relapse (HR = 1.63 for 2nd, HR = 1.75 for 3rd, and HR = 2.31 for 4th quartile). Conclusions Weight-based MMF dose had no significant impact on engraftment, chronic GVHD, or survival. These data suggest that higher weight-based MMF dose reduces the risk of acute GVHD at the expense of increased relapse and supports conducting prospective studies to optimize MMF dosing after HCT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据