4.7 Article

Have driving restrictions reduced air pollution: evidence from prefecture-level cities of China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 3106-3120

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10664-9

关键词

Air pollution; Driving restrictions; Difference-in-differences; Propensity score matching

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71704065]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [2020A151501226]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities-Ningjingzhiyuan Project of Jinan University [19JNQM21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that driving restrictions in China did not significantly improve air quality in cities, as people did not clearly shift from private cars to public transportation. Additionally, the effects of driving restrictions varied across different regions and cities in China.
With rapid economic development, air pollution became a serious problem in China. Vehicle's exhaust emissions are among the main sources of air pollution. With samples of 173 prefecture-level cities in China from 2006 to 2016, this paper takes the implementation of driving restrictions as a quasi-natural experiment to examine the relationship between driving restrictions and air quality through the difference-in-differences method based on the propensity score matching. Results indicate that driving restrictions have not improved the air quality in terms of average treatment effect as there is no clear evidence that people turn from private cars to busses or subways. Furthermore, heterogeneous effects of driving restrictions exist across different regions and cities of China. The implementation of driving restrictions has significantly positive impacts on air pollution in the Eastern and Central cities of China, while it has significantly negative effects in non-capital cities. This study implies that the development of local public transportation needs to be taken into account when formulating the policy of driving restrictions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据