4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of Ni-doped anatase TiO2loaded on magnetic activated carbon for rapidly removing triphenylmethane dyes

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 3475-3483

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10698-z

关键词

Anatase TiO2; Magnetic activated carbon; Photodegradation; Triphenylmethane dyes

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21868034]
  2. Shaanxi Provincial Key Research and Development Projects of China [2018KW-036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Fe(3)O(4) was implanted into activated carbon using in situ synthesis method to create magnetic activated carbon (MAC), which was then used as a support for anchoring Ni-doped anatase TiO2 (NATiO(2)) to synthesize a series of Ni-TiO2/MAC photocatalysts. The results showed that these photocatalysts exhibited high removal efficiency for TPMs, good cycle stability, and ease of reusability.
In this work, we employed the in situ synthesis method to implant Fe(3)O(4)into activated carbon (AC), in which the synthesis of the magnetic AC (MAC) was realized. Thence, Ni-doped anatase TiO2(NATiO(2)) were anchored on different addition amount of MAC to synthesize the series of Ni-TiO2/MAC photocatalysts. The chemical compositions and physical properties of these nanocomposites were analyzed by various characterization technologies. The photocatalytic capabilities of as-produced materials were then investigated via adsorption and photodegradation of triphenylmethane dyes (TPMs) as crystal violet (CV), basic fuchsine (BF), and malachite green (MG) solution. The results revealed that the removal of Ni-TiO2/AC, Ni-TiO2/2MAC, Ni-TiO2/4MAC, and Ni-TiO2/8MAC on TPMs is a very fast process and the removal efficiency can almost reach to about 90% in 10 min, and the catalyst has good cycle stability and is easy to be reused. This work provides a novel, low-cost, and effective way to rationally design and synthesize TiO2-based photocatalysts for effective removal of TPMs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据