4.8 Article

A Hybrid Metal-Organic Framework-Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanomaterial for Selective Removal of Chromate from Water in an Electrochemical Process

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 54, 期 20, 页码 13322-13332

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c04703

关键词

MOF@rGO; selective electrosorption; electrochemical reduction; charge efficiency

资金

  1. NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment [ERC-1449500]
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologi'ene Oxide Nanomaterial for Selective Removal of Chromate from Water in an Electrochemical Process [665318]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is a highly toxic groundwater contaminant. In this study, we demonstrate a selective electrochemical process tailored for removal of Cr(VI) using a hybrid MOF@rGO nanomaterial synthesized by in situ growth of a nanocrystalline, mixed ligand octahedral metal-organic framework with cobalt metal centers, [Co-2(btec)(bipy)(DMF)(2)](n) (Co-MOF), on the surface of reduced graphene oxide (rGO). The rGO provides the electric conductivity necessary for an electrode, while the Co-MOF endows highly selective adsorption sites for CrO42-. When used as an anode in the treatment cycles, the MOF@rGO electrode exhibits strong selectivity for adsorption of CrO42- over competing anions including Cl-, SO42-, and As(III) and achieves charge efficiency (CE) >100% due to the strong physisorption of CrO42- by Co-MOF; both electro- and physisorption capacities are regenerated with the reversal of the applied voltage, when highly toxic Cr(VI) is reduced to less toxic reduced Cr species and subsequently released into brine. This approach allows easy regeneration of the nonconducting Co-MOF without any chemical addition while simultaneously transforming Cr(VI), inspiring a novel electrochemical method for highly selective degradation of toxic contaminants using tailor-designed electrodes with high affinity adsorbents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据